Heads up, AP. In an interview that aired Monday night, President Obama signaled his apparent desire for another Stylebook rewrite. Out: “American.” In: “U.S. person.”!/Cameron_Gray/status/346840542954532865

Yep, another term sacrificed on the oh-so-inclusive altar of progressive Newspeak. So … what, pray tell, is a “U.S. person” anyway? It must mean something since President Citizen of the World said it more than once during the interview with Charlie Rose.

What I can say unequivocally is that if you are a U.S. person, the NSA cannot listen to your telephone calls, and the NSA cannot target your emails … and have not. They cannot and have not, by law and by rule, and unless they — and usually it wouldn’t be “they,” it’d be the FBI — go to a court, and obtain a warrant, and seek probable cause, the same way it’s always been, the same way when we were growing up and we were watching movies, you want to go set up a wiretap, you got to go to a judge, show probable cause….

So point number one, if you’re a U.S. person, then NSA is not listening to your phone calls and it’s not targeting your emails unless it’s getting an individualized court order. That’s the existing rule.

Got that, U.S. persons?!/BryanTripoli/status/346838583660916736

Is a “U.S. person” an American? A catchall that includes undocumented Democrats? (Shout-out to the “Dreamers!”)!/BreakingNewzman/status/346841309329362945

But American just sounds so imperialistic and exclusive, dontcha think? No?!/plerer/status/346836806798544896!/jclaireb/status/346833376470257664

Up next: USian. We wish we were kidding.



For those wondering how the NSA defines “U.S. person”:

Federal law and executive order define a U.S. Person as:

a. a citizen of the United States;

b. an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence;

c. an unincorporated association with a substantial number of members who are citizens of the U.S. or are aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence; or,

d. a corporation that is incorporated in the U.S.

Heh. So Obama’s saying corporations are people? Someone get the Soros monkeys on this!

Read more:!/Beltrew/status/280080226879410176

Egyptians appear set to approve the country’s new constitution by a wide margin today via a nationwide referendum. The Muslim Brotherhood, which has backed President Mohamed Morsi and the proposed constitution, is reporting on the vote via its Twitter feed.

UPDATE: results from 3329/6376 Polling Stations counted nationwide:YES 60.6%NO 39.4%

— Ikhwanweb (@Ikhwanweb) December 15, 2012

Those numbers seem to match those reported by Egyptian media. Much of the no vote seems to be coming from Egypt’s second-largest city, Alexandria, where violent clashes are reported to have left at least 19 injured.

Shout out to Alexandrians for being the most awesome people in Egypt with a majority of the “no” vote.

— Marwa Ragab (@Marwa__Raafat) December 15, 2012

Alexandria > Egypt. Also when is Alexandria going to declare its independence from Egypt?

— دارين كشرى (@DareenSawan) December 15, 2012

Alexandria is Rome, but Egypt is definitely not Italy.

— My name is Adam (@Ahmedd_haridy) December 15, 2012

According to AlWatan newspaper : Alexandria 27% yes and 73% NO #Egypt

— Amany Elshennawy (@AmanyElShennawy) December 15, 2012

Some media outlets, including Reuters and the Jerusalem Post, are reporting that the office of the Wafd opposition party was attacked with petrol bombs and birdshot late in the day.

Can we confirm burning of Wafd HQ and is there any violence at Sabahi HQ? #egypt

— Cliff Cheney (@cliffcheney) December 15, 2012

Update: it seems it was a failed attempt to set the Wafd building on Fire, just some damage via @cliffcheney#Egypt

— Nervana Mahmoud (@Nervana_1) December 15, 2012

Disturbing! RT @cairowire: Al Wafd Party confirms that its headquarters have been attacked and a fire has been set inside. #dec15 #egypt

— Fahad (@13411Fahad) December 15, 2012

Yes votes come high… What should we do? Of course fire the Wafd Party Building and Blaim the Salafis. Classic :))) #Egypt

— Ahmet Yusuf Özdemir (@ayusufozdemir) December 15, 2012

As CBS reports, “The draft would empower Islamists to carry out the most widespread and strictest implementation of Islamic law that modern Egypt has seen.” We can’t confirm the text on this sign, but it’s being retweeted quite a bit.

Results of the new dictatorship in #Egypt: ‘Yes to Morsi’s constitution so i can get married at 9′ !!!…

— Emz (@emmasuleiman) December 15, 2012

@nadaskandar Did you personally see this and take this picture? Is it a tactic to get people to say no or is it for real?

— Tarek Nasr (@TarekNasr360) December 15, 2012

@nadaskandar sadly true, a mad sheikh did make fatwa, also in Saudi. Sickening

— S. EL-SAID (@elsaidst) December 15, 2012


Here is the tally by city according to the Muslim Brotherhood’s feed.

Final results, YES/NO:1-Alexandria 55.6/44.42-Assyout 76.1/23.93-Aswan 76.4/23.64-Cairo 43/575-Dakahlyya 55.1/44.96-Gharbyya 48/52

— Ikhwanweb (@Ikhwanweb) December 16, 2012

Read more: