“This is how Planet of the Apes started.” Or maybe not. BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { if (BF_STATIC.bf_test_mode) localStorage.setItem(‘posted_date’, 1407333348); }); BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { document.getElementById(“update_posted_time_3409888”).innerHTML = “posted on ” + UI.dateFormat.get_formatted_date(1407333348); });

1. A monkey took this selfie in Indonesia in 2011.

A monkey took this selfie in Indonesia in 2011.

View this image ›

David Slater/Caters

The crested black macaque managed to take the picture after playing around with British photographer David Slater’s equipment.

2. The monkey selfie is currently the centre of a copyright row between Wikipedia and Slater – supposedly on the grounds that Wikipedia thinks the monkey owns the copyright to the photo.

The monkey selfie is currently the centre of a copyright row between Wikipedia and Slater – supposedly on the grounds that Wikipedia thinks the monkey owns the copyright to the photo.

View this image ›

David Slater/Caters

Slater, who owned the camera that the picture was taken on, claims the copyright is his, and demanded that Wikipedia remove the image, as revealed in the transparency report released today by the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organisation that has oversight of Wikipedia and related projects. Wikimedia refused his demand.

Slater seems to be the source of the claim that Wikipedia thinks the copyright belongs to the monkey. “If the monkey took it, it owns copyright, not me, that’s their basic argument,” he told The Telegraph.

3. But that’s not true. The Wikipedia page is very clear that they think nobody owns the copyright. Because monkeys can’t own the copyright on things.

But that’s not true. The Wikipedia page is very clear that they think nobody owns the copyright. Because monkeys can’t own the copyright on things.

View this image ›

commons.wikimedia.org

Wikipedia’s argument is simply that Slater cannot own the copyright, because (despite the camera being his) he didn’t create the picture himself. When Slater first sold the picture around the world in 2011, he was very clear that the picture came about by accident.

The case – which Slater suggests he is planning to bring to court – raises some interesting questions. How much intent does a photographer have to have to capture a specific image before they can claim copyright on it? Would this be different if, say, Slater had deliberately set up a tripwire or light trap to trigger the camera when a monkey moved into frame?

Equally, does simply owning the tools a picture was produced with (in this case, the camera) mean you own the copyright? Does the owner of a wall get the copyright to graffiti painted on it? If you borrow somebody’s paints and brushes to create a painting, do they have part of the copyright?

4. The interesting debate hasn’t stopped those on Twitter expressing their shock at the suggestion a monkey could own the copyright to something.

nigelnicholas.com @nigel_nicholas

“The monkey owns the copyright” – a ridiculous interpretation of copyright law http://t.co/5ZmI3KKHP9 #photography #photographer

BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { if (BF_STATIC.bf_test_mode) localStorage.setItem(‘tweet_posted_date’, ‘Wed Aug 06 13:22:44 UTC+0000 2014’); }); BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { if (BF_STATIC.bf_test_mode) localStorage.setItem(‘utc_posted_date’, ‘Wed Aug 06 13:22:44 UTC+0000 2014’); }); BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { if (bfjs.isMobile() || !isIE8()) document.getElementById(“update_tweet_posted_time_3538216”).setAttribute(‘title’, ‘Time posted: ‘ + UI.dateFormat.get_formatted_date(‘Wed Aug 06 13:22:44 UTC+0000 2014’, ‘UTC’) ); }); BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { document.getElementById(“update_tweet_posted_time_3538216”).innerHTML = UI.dateFormat.get_formatted_date(‘Wed Aug 06 13:22:44 UTC+0000 2014’, ‘tweet’); });

Andrew Webster @A_Webster

this is how planet of the apes started http://t.co/OepdTKh9GK

BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { if (BF_STATIC.bf_test_mode) localStorage.setItem(‘tweet_posted_date’, ‘Wed Aug 06 13:40:10 +0000 2014’); }); BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { if (BF_STATIC.bf_test_mode) localStorage.setItem(‘utc_posted_date’, ‘Wed Aug 06 13:40:10 +0000 2014’); }); BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { if (bfjs.isMobile() || !isIE8()) document.getElementById(“update_tweet_posted_time_3538305”).setAttribute(‘title’, ‘Time posted: ‘ + UI.dateFormat.get_formatted_date(‘Wed Aug 06 13:40:10 +0000 2014’, ‘UTC’) ); }); BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { document.getElementById(“update_tweet_posted_time_3538305”).innerHTML = UI.dateFormat.get_formatted_date(‘Wed Aug 06 13:40:10 +0000 2014’, ‘tweet’); });

Alex Andreou @sturdyAlex

“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for goo… HOW CAN A MONKEY OWN THE COPYRIGHT TO HIS SELFIE?” ~ Twitter, Every Single Day

BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { if (BF_STATIC.bf_test_mode) localStorage.setItem(‘tweet_posted_date’, ‘Wed Aug 06 12:45:24 +0000 2014’); }); BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { if (BF_STATIC.bf_test_mode) localStorage.setItem(‘utc_posted_date’, ‘Wed Aug 06 12:45:24 +0000 2014’); }); BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { if (bfjs.isMobile() || !isIE8()) document.getElementById(“update_tweet_posted_time_3538153”).setAttribute(‘title’, ‘Time posted: ‘ + UI.dateFormat.get_formatted_date(‘Wed Aug 06 12:45:24 +0000 2014’, ‘UTC’) ); }); BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { document.getElementById(“update_tweet_posted_time_3538153”).innerHTML = UI.dateFormat.get_formatted_date(‘Wed Aug 06 12:45:24 +0000 2014’, ‘tweet’); });

J. Graeme Noseworthy @graemeknows

Even if they use stolen equipment, the fact is that monkeys own the rights to their selfies. http://t.co/hHJXLBqtbO Yes. Really.

BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { if (BF_STATIC.bf_test_mode) localStorage.setItem(‘tweet_posted_date’, ‘Wed Aug 06 13:29:09 +0000 2014’); }); BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { if (BF_STATIC.bf_test_mode) localStorage.setItem(‘utc_posted_date’, ‘Wed Aug 06 13:29:09 +0000 2014’); }); BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { if (bfjs.isMobile() || !isIE8()) document.getElementById(“update_tweet_posted_time_3538210”).setAttribute(‘title’, ‘Time posted: ‘ + UI.dateFormat.get_formatted_date(‘Wed Aug 06 13:29:09 +0000 2014’, ‘UTC’) ); }); BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { document.getElementById(“update_tweet_posted_time_3538210”).innerHTML = UI.dateFormat.get_formatted_date(‘Wed Aug 06 13:29:09 +0000 2014’, ‘tweet’); });

Boris Watch @BorisWatch

RT if you'd prefer to have the selfie-taking monkey as Prime Minister than Boris Johnson

BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { if (BF_STATIC.bf_test_mode) localStorage.setItem(‘tweet_posted_date’, ‘Wed Aug 06 11:54:46 +0000 2014’); }); BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { if (BF_STATIC.bf_test_mode) localStorage.setItem(‘utc_posted_date’, ‘Wed Aug 06 11:54:46 +0000 2014’); }); BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { if (bfjs.isMobile() || !isIE8()) document.getElementById(“update_tweet_posted_time_3538172”).setAttribute(‘title’, ‘Time posted: ‘ + UI.dateFormat.get_formatted_date(‘Wed Aug 06 11:54:46 +0000 2014’, ‘UTC’) ); }); BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { document.getElementById(“update_tweet_posted_time_3538172”).innerHTML = UI.dateFormat.get_formatted_date(‘Wed Aug 06 11:54:46 +0000 2014’, ‘tweet’); });

Read more: http://buzzfeed.com/richardhjames/wikipedia-claims-a-monkey-owns-the-copyright-to-this-picture

Is-wikipedia-the-key-to-predicting-mitt-romney-s-vp--fbfd48dd16

Wikipedia might be the key to predicting Mitt Romney’s pick for a running mate as the political world scrambles to figure out his nominee before the campaign’s official announcement, according to a new report.

Sarah Palin and Joe Biden, 2008’s VP nominees, both saw a considerable spike in the number of edits made to their Wikipedia pages in the hours before they were announced as the candidates. Micah Sifry, co-founder of the Personal Democracy Forum, wrote for TechPresident Monday reminding the political world of the hereunto mostly overlooked fact.

“Sarah Palin’s Wikipedia page was updated at least 68 times the day before John McCain announced her selection, with another 54 changes made in the five previous days previous,” wrote Sifry. “The same burst of last-minute editing appeared on Joe Biden’s Wikipedia page, Terry Gudaitis of Cyveillance, told the Washington Post.”

Essentially, Sifry is suggesting that political candidates’ staff are making these changes to Wikipedia pages in order to clean up the pages prior to the public unveiling of the VP pick.

That hasn’t been proven, but Wikipedia is a publicly-editable knowledge database that’s become a go-to source for information about almost any subject, political candidates included. Therefore, it makes sense that politicians’ staff would edit a possible VP’s page before the candidate is thrust into the public eye and millions visit the site for information about their history and political stances.

Mashable covered the “Wikipedia Effect” in politics earlier this year, finding that Mitt Romney’s page saw a considerable spike in edits just before, during and immediately after primary elections — a sign that Wikipedia users may have been trying to influence voters by changing details about Romney’s history on the site.

Does Wikipedia’s publicly-editable nature make it a less reliable source for information about current events, such as politics? Share your thoughts in the comments.

Image courtesy of Mitt Romney on Facebook

Read more: http://mashable.com/2012/08/07/wikipedia-romney-vice-president/